![]() |
| River Spey Report January 2010 |
| Previous Trout and Salmon Reports |
|
In his address to the AGM of the Spey Fishery Board [SFB], Director, Mr Roger Knight, highlighted six main points – Core Paths, Water Abstraction, Catch Returns, Conservation Policy, Hatchery and the work of the Spey Research Trust, which has now changed from this to the “Spey Foundation”, a charitable arm, with a structure similar to that of the Tweed Foundation. Whist issues with Water Abstraction at the top end of the river rumble on, the board are keen to ensure, within its remit, as good a solution as possible for the proposed project to supply the growing community of Aviemore, as well as the rest of Speyside with drinking water, is found. The proposal is for water to be taken via boreholes form an area south west of Aviemore. Although this has potentially serious implications for the river, its aquatic, as well as non aquatic life forms, my feeling here is – Economic and social arguments will prevail over that of conservation! In what has been a lengthy process, the SFB have, and continue to explore every avenue, ensuring the best deal possible for the river and fishery. Conservation Policy – With regard to both Salmon and Sea Trout, it was felt this was working well and Chairman; Mr Alan Williams applauded owners whom had adopted the voluntary policy and their contribution to returning 77% of salmon and 64% of Sea Trout during 2009. With regard to 2010, because of “later run times”, the board are suggesting a slight change, dropping the reference to returning all hen fish to the end of June, instead, encouraging this to be done throughout the season. Hatchery and Stocking – The Chairman reiterated that the board had no policy to reduce or cease stocking. The policy of the board will continue much as it has over the past few years, that is; the 1.1 million fry taken from both Tulchan and the Sandbank Hatchery will be planted out in the following areas – 1. Parts of the river inaccessible to fish because of man made barriers and dams. 2. Areas in which juvenile survey work suggest salmon stocks are vulnerable. This gave rise to a question from the floor – Mr Graham Mackenzie [RSAA], asked why the board concentrated its stocking efforts on the top end of the river whilst places like the Fochabers burn seemed to be overlooked. This was answered by Spey Biologist, Mr Bob Laughton, who explained – At one time they did stock this burn and that results were fairly poor, thus moving the emphasis into places which proved to be better. Mr Mackenzie also felt, possibly the board could introduce some fish to the main-stem in this part of the river. Mr Laughton thought that more juvenile survey work in this area would confirm whether this was needed. The abundance of Minnows in the lower part of the river also gave cause for concern. Mr Mackenzie asked whether these fish, introduced to the river by fishing them live for Trout, were impacting on native Salmon and Trout Fry and Parr.
Mr Laughton seemed a little concerned about this, pointed to increasing evidence that minnows will indeed displace both salmon and sea trout, more particularly the latter, in competition for the same resource. In his forward within the annual report, Chairman, Mr Alan Williams, describes one stocking project carried out by The SFB as being remarkably successful.
The small project on the Dullan Water [tributary of the Fiddich], was prompted after the clearing of a man made obstacle, with the result that fish can now ascend, and indeed colonise, this excellent nursery area.
With “significant reductions” of salmon returning to our rivers, it’s pleasing to hear of projects which can be quantified as being positive with regard to the river producing more
smolts. Some good Spey Spring patterns can be viewed here on my
Gallery and
on my blog at the address below. |
| View the Speycaster Blog (opens in new window) |
| Top |
| Back to the Trout and Salmon Reports |
| Connect to Frames | Copyrights & Disclaimer | Sitemap |